![]() Luther National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership pp. 1093-1097 Thomas Wahl, Shaleen Jain, Jens Bender, Steven D. Donato, Solichin Manuri, Haruni Krisnawati, Sartji Taberima and Sofyan Kurnianto Increasing risk of compound flooding from storm surge and rainfall for major US cities pp. 1089-1092 Daniel Murdiyarso, Joko Purbopuspito, J. Price The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation pp. Agustí Shift from coral to macroalgae dominance on a volcanically acidified reef pp. Munday Temperature dependence of CO2-enhanced primary production in the European Arctic Ocean pp. Berumen, William Leggat, Timothy Ravasi and Philip L. Donelson, Lynne van Herwerden, Loqmane Seridi, Yanal Ghosheh, Michael L. Martin Molecular processes of transgenerational acclimation to a warming ocean pp. McCoy and Mario Teisl Coupling between air travel and climate pp. 1061-1063 Lambert Schneider and Anja Kollmuss Australians' views on carbon pricing before and after the 2013 federal election pp. van Vuuren, Niklas Höhne, Pedro Faria, Nate Aden and Alberto Carrillo Pineda Perverse effects of carbon markets on HFC-23 and SF6 abatement projects in Russia pp. 1057-1060 Oskar Krabbe, Giel Linthorst, Kornelis Blok, Wina Crijns-Graus, Detlef P. 1054-1056 Boris Kingma and Wouter van Marken Lichtenbelt Aligning corporate greenhouse-gas emissions targets with climate goals pp. Ford, Graham McDowell and Tristan Pearce Energy consumption in buildings and female thermal demand pp. Macreadie The adaptation challenge in the Arctic pp. Pidgeon Predators help protect carbon stocks in blue carbon ecosystems pp. 1031-1037 Adrian Brügger, Suraje Dessai, Patrick Devine-Wright, Thomas A. 1029-1030 Joost van Hoof Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change pp. 1028-1029 Richard Matear and Andrew Lenton Female thermal demand pp. 1027-1027 Mat Hope Restoration of the oceans pp. 1027-1027 Eithne Tynan Geoengineering challenges pp. 1027-1027 Bronwyn Wake Regional loss impacts pp. 1027-1027 Alastair Brown Monsoon uncertainties pp. 1025-1026 Victoria Hurth and Patricia McCarney Rapid adaptation pp. 1024-1025 Erin Roberts, Stephanie Andrei, Saleemul Huq and Lawrence Flint International standards for climate-friendly cities pp. Nassikas Resilience synergies in the post-2015 development agenda pp. Volume 5, isA role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2 pp. Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series. Track citations for all items by RSS feed 2.Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (). We use a 70 year timeframe, capturing more than 99 % of the total integrated methane loading over all time. The April–September average of the 1-h daily maximum ozone concentration response to an elevated atmospheric loading of methane is derived from a 3.0 to 3.6 ppb change as a steady-state response to a 139 Tg reduction in annual methane emissions (Anenberg et al. Methane \((\hbox \) of methane is equivalent to 12 Tg of atmospheric methane loading, we calculate the ozone response in year t to a 1 Tg pulse of methane at time zero to be This methodology can be used to assess the benefits of methane emission reductions anywhere in the world, including those achieved by national and multinational policies. Regionally, most of the global mortality benefits accrue in Asia, but 10 % accrue in the United States. The benefits increase for emission years further in the future. Results for monetized benefits are sensitive to a number of factors, particularly the choice of elasticity to income growth used when calculating the value of a statistical life. These correspond to approximately 70 and 150 % of the valuation of methane’s global climate impacts using the SCC after extrapolating from carbon dioxide to methane using global warming potential estimates. We find that the global short- and long-term premature mortality benefits due to reduced ozone production from methane mitigation are (2011) $790 and $1775 per tonne methane, respectively. Our methods are consistent with those used by the US Government to estimate the social cost of carbon (SCC). We estimate the benefits of reducing methane emissions anywhere in the world for ozone-related premature mortality globally and for eight geographic regions. Reducing methane emissions will both slow anthropogenic climate change and reduce ozone-related mortality. ![]() Methane is a greenhouse gas that oxidizes to form ground-level ozone, itself a greenhouse gas and a health-harmful air pollutant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |